Legal abortion to not die

My opinion on this subject is a bit blunt, because I firmly believe that it should not be subject to any questioning. The interruption of a pregnancy must be based on the will of the woman, who has the right to enjoy a dignified, non-violent attention and without medical objectors.

The decision to interrupt a pregnancy is only of the woman who carries it, for the reasons that she considers pertinent. And he has the right to demand medical attention based on this decision: without the risk of abortion in hiding, accessible to all regardless of social class, and considering the care required. 

 Is important to mention that the process is completely safely during the first three months of life of the embryo, taking the pills indicated in the recommended portions. For 100 abortions that occurred in Chile , 30 are complicated, but under medical treatment is enough. It is a safe procedure and the medical complications only are for hemorrhage and infections generated by a contained abortion. Both have medical treatment, the problem... it is illegal.

Finally I woul like to show you a case of Fernanda Sandoval, who appealed to the abortion law in the case of “Fetal non viability” in Chile. But for a objector doctor, this case finally was a terrible experience for the woman, because no one gave him the attention that he required.

Abortion should be a universal right. Independent of the moral, ethical burden that a certain group of Chilean society has, each woman has the right to decide about her own body, because the reasons for abortion are diverse. Abortion in a safe procedure. The mayor causes of death of women in chile are femicide (last year, 44 completed feminicides and 115 frustrated feminicides are registered in Chile), complications in normal childbirth, hypertension and diabetes.